The #1 Bestseller Every Marketer Needs The Decagon Code of Marketing MistakesThe #1 Bestseller Every Marketer Needs The Decagon Code of Marketing Mistakes
HomePress ReleaseEIN PresswireIvy Energy Calls on Media Outlets and Journalists to Bring Awareness to...

Ivy Energy Calls on Media Outlets and Journalists to Bring Awareness to CPUC’s Proposed Decision


SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, August 10, 2023/EINPresswire.com/ — Ivy Energy’s Vice President of Advertising and marketing, Austin Younger, at this time referred to as on media shops and esteemed journalists to shine a light-weight on the California Public Utilities Fee (CPUC)’s latest proposal. This proposal, if accepted, will markedly have an effect on rooftop photo voltaic adoption for a various array of Californians, primarily renters, faculties, farmers, and multifamily property house owners. “The implications of this proposal are profound. It veers away from California’s esteemed clear power ambitions, doubtlessly putting monetary pressure on renters, property house owners, and establishments like faculties,” stated Younger. “This story deserves strong journalistic scrutiny, not only for its power implications however for its broader socio-economic impacts.”

Dissecting the CPUC’s Proposed Decision (PD):

Full Dis incentivization of Photo voltaic and Batteries:

The proposal’s ramifications for multi-unit properties are grim. Homeowners are actually dealing with an uphill battle if they want to spend money on rooftop photo voltaic and batteries. The brand new guidelines would compel clients to commerce their photo voltaic manufacturing to utilities earlier than shopping for it again at a marked-up worth. This not solely negates the photo voltaic self-reliance ethos but in addition financially pressurizes each property house owners and renters.

Internet Metering and Energy Netting:

The PD intends to abolish internet metering and power netting for all shared property tenants, be they residential or industrial. There is a transfer to credit score all Digital Internet Energy Metering (VNEM) manufacturing at Averted Price Calculator (ACC) charges with a paltry adder within the preliminary 5 years. Such a transfer not solely deviates from previous rules but in addition renders photo voltaic investments on shared properties financially unviable.

Ignoring Physics and Moral Grounds:

The proposal turns a blind eye to the elemental reality that VNEM PV programs counteract on-site masses. Denying multi-dwelling items the privilege of using their photo voltaic era goes towards the grain of power era and consumption’s foundational physics. Furthermore, the considered utilities reselling photo voltaic power to tenants at top-tier costs flirts with quite a few moral quandaries.

A Bias In opposition to Renters:

At its core, the choice appears skewed towards renters. The proposal acts as a barrier, stopping renters, particularly from low-income backgrounds and communities of colour, from harnessing photo voltaic advantages akin to particular person owners. The ramifications for California’s renters, who’re already grappling with towering utility charges, are far-reaching.

Contradictions with Previous Selections:

The CPUC has traditionally differentiated between on-site power consumption and utility grid exports for particular person properties. However this proposal glosses over this distinction, successfully compelling shared properties to half with their power era at rock-bottom costs and then purchase it again at retail charges.

Sturdy Opposition from Business and Native Authorities:

The proposal has been met with robust resistance from a whole bunch of fresh power and renters’ rights advocates, reasonably priced housing, farms, and faculties, 135 native elected officers, and metropolis councils, all of whom spotlight its deep flaws and inequities. The Oakland Metropolis Council’s latest decision is a distinguished instance of opposition on the municipal stage. The just lately adopted decision by the Oakland Metropolis Council calls on the CPUC and Governor Newsom “to reject any proposals that search to frustrate or dismantle the power of multifamily tenants and faculties to avail themselves of the advantages of native, renewable, and reasonably priced power by rooftop photo voltaic and battery storage.”

Inconsistency with State Directives:

The CPUC proposal stands at odds with CA Title 24, which mandates photo voltaic adoption for multifamily buildings. This obtrusive inconsistency accentuates the disconnect between state ambitions and CPUC’s course, which makes such photo voltaic adoption economically unfeasible.

Utility Income over Public Welfare?:

A pertinent query arising from the proposal is its intent. There’s rising sentiment that it is tailor-made extra to cushion utility income than to serve the general public. It seems to let utilities misconstrue photo voltaic consumption, enabling them to profiteer by promoting again to customers at exorbitant charges.

Ivy Energy’s Stance and Dedication:

In conclusion, amidst the oscillating stances of the CPUC, a recurring theme emerges a tilt towards preserving utility income at the price of the general public and the setting. The proposed determination is slated for a vote by the CPUC commissioners on September 21, 2023. At Ivy Energy, we firmly consider in equitable entry to clear power—whether or not for owners or renters. We stay unwavering in our dedication to craft a sturdy response and to be actively concerned all through the decision-making course of.

For Additional Info:

Ivy Energy stays dedicated to voicing considerations and opposing choices that do not serve the most effective pursuits of Californians. We thanks in your continued help and understanding. We’re at all times right here to reply your questions, present insights, and help in any capability. Let’s work collectively for a sustainable and equitable power future for California. Forward of the CPUC’s scheduled vote on September 21, Ivy Energy invitations journalists, media homes, and the broader public to be a part of the dialog, ask questions, and be certain that the narrative surrounding this determination is well-understood.

“The CPUC’s proposal contradicts a number of established power practices and rules,” added Younger. “We firmly consider within the energy of a well-informed public. Via media consciousness, Californians can achieve a deeper understanding of the proposal’s ramifications and voice their considerations.”

Austin Younger and the Ivy Energy group can be found for interviews, providing insights, knowledge, and professional opinions on this pivotal improvement in California’s power narrative. For extra insights concerning the CPUC Proposed Decision, go to https://www.ivy-energy.com/weblog/cpuc-proposal-ivy-energys-response-and-perspective or this truth sheet supplied by solarrights.org https://docs.google.com/doc/d/1SUgD1GRKx620Hy0FemfJSwNIxAogUdV2u5inC-_2xwk/edit

Contact: Austin@ivy-energy.com

Austin Younger
Ivy Energy
+1 801-318-7803
e mail us right here
Go to us on social media:
Fb
Twitter
LinkedIn
Instagram
YouTube



RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular