HomeIndiaDaughters Get Equal Coparcenary Rights As Sons Even If Father Died Before...

Daughters Get Equal Coparcenary Rights As Sons Even If Father Died Before 2005 Amendment Says Orissa High Court | Orissa HC: Daughter has equal right in father’s property, Odisha HC told

Orissa High Court: Odisha High Court has given an enormous determination relating to the rights of daughters on the ancestral property of the daddy. The courtroom stated that daughters are equally entitled to the property of the mother and father as sons and so they have the right over the ancestral property of the daddy.

The courtroom has given this determination relating to the division of property amongst three sisters and brothers. The courtroom stated that even when the daddy had died earlier than the Hindu Succession Amendment Act, the women had been equally entitled to the property of the mother and father as sons. The listening to of this case was being accomplished by the bench of Justice Vidyut Ranjan Sarangi and Justice Murari Shri Raman. Referring to a historic determination of the Supreme Court in Vinita Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma, the courtroom stated that beneath the Mitakshara legislation, in joint households, the daughter is taken into account equal to the son. The daughter has the identical right in the ancestral property because the son.

Court’s Word
Mitakshara legislation provides sons the right by beginning in joint property. This legislation was amended in 2005 to incorporate ladies as effectively. The daddy of the petitioner had died on March 19, 2005 and the Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 got here into drive on September 9, 2005. The petitioner says that after the loss of life of the daddy, his three brothers bought the property in their title beneath the Odisha Land Reforms Act. This was challenged by the petitioner and her three sisters earlier than the sub-collector and he or she turned an equal sharer in the father’s ancestral property. However the brothers challenged this determination in the Claims Fee. On this, the Claims Fee handed an order in opposition to the petitioner after which the matter reached the High Court.

What does the legislation say?
Right here, the courtroom dominated in favor of the petitioner, saying that Mitakshara legislation provides equal rights to the son in the joint household property as his father from beginning. It states that every one the male descendants of a Hindu in the male line as much as the fourth technology are his sons. It was additional said that the daughter doesn’t get the right by beginning in the joint household property, however the Hindu Succession Act 1956 in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra and Karnataka amended the legislation by including part 6-A and adopted the traces of those 4 states However the Hindu Succession Act 2005 got here into drive throughout India. The High Court directed the Claims Fee to take a recent determination in this matter.

Learn additionally:

25 Years Of NDA: NDA’s present of energy in Delhi on 18th July! To this point invites have been despatched to 19 events


Most Popular